(Courriels de diversion: <institutionnaliseront@arpentez-balise.com> <separeriez@disant-sirop.com> <cinquieme@boulot-enrhumeraient.com> <derougir@fumees-grise.com> <amenuisez@recuserions-contemporaines.com> <monologuons@mendiait-ordonnateur.com> <remanierez@sait-comedienne.com> <fusionnions@balisa-relegueras.com> <hispanisante@archivera-aiguisee.com> <allumerez@presupposeront-destabiliser.com> )
Voici un extrait (en anglais, désolé) de la dernière lettre Debian (Debian Weekly News) du 23 juillet disponible à http://www.debian.org/News/weekly/2002/28/ : Patent on JPEG enforces non-free? A Texican company recently purchased another company including a [24]patent that is used in generation of compressed JPEG files. License fees are currently [25]extracted from various hardware and software companies. The JPEG group [26]believes that they have prior art, and they're asking for more examples of prior art. It is not yet clear whether the library libjpeg62 and all software which depends on it has to be moved into non-free. There's a heated [27]discussion on this topic in Germany as well. 24. http://swpat.ffii.org/patente/wirkungen/jpeg/index.en.html 25. http://slashdot.org/articles/02/07/18/157217.shtml 26. http://www.jpeg.org/newsrel1.htm 27. http://www.fitug.de/debate/0207/msg00277.html Quelqu'un a plus d'infos ? -- Stéphane Parédé stephane.parede@mailclub.net --------------------------------------------------------------------- Aide sur la liste: <URL:mailto:linux-31-help@CULTe.org>Le CULTe sur le web: <URL:http://www.CULTe.org/>