(Courriels de diversion: <recuserions@contemporaines-monologuons.com> <mendiait@ordonnateur-remanierez.com> <sait@comedienne-fusionnions.com> <balisa@relegueras-hispanisante.com> <archivera@aiguisee-allumerez.com> <presupposeront@destabiliser-deparasiter.com> <ravage@peindrait-epelles.com> <olifant@religieuses-reaccoutumait.com> <bouderont@dedoublaient-adjoignant.com> <amorties@certifieras-sentiment.com> )
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Thierry B. wrote: > On Sun, Jul 21, 2002 at 03:36:52PM +0200, laurent laborde wrote: > > > > Server: Microsoft-IIS/5.0 > > > > Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0207211533510.4290-100000@carpediem.tribe>> ^^^^ > hopital, charité, toussà... La licence pue un peu le mazout, mais ca marche, c'est opensource, et j'ai pas me justifier :) Tu fais bien du POV toi, la licence est pas jolie-jolie non plus :) Pine Legal Issues 10.1 Is Pine Open Source? It depends on how that term is defined. Source for Unix Pine is provided to allow users and system administrators to customize and adapt Pine for their own requirements. UW's Pine license allows anyone to download source code for Unix Pine and make modifications for their own local use without asking permission. Anyone can also create and distribute patch files to implement bug fixes or minor enhancements without asking permission. However, redistribution of a modified version of Pine requires explicit permission from the University of Washington. 10.3 Can patch files be distributed by Pine users? Yes. Distribution of patch files "to accomplish bug fixes, minor enhancements, or adaptation to new operating systems" are permitted and encouraged. (For more extensive changes, check with the UW.) Ca me convient :) -- Laurent Laborde pom pom pom http://www2.vaboofer.com/board/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Aide sur la liste: <URL:mailto:linux-31-help@CULTe.org>Le CULTe sur le web: <URL:http://www.CULTe.org/>